Anybody discover the latest change to Norton Safety about requring their Browser extensions be put in. : antivirus

The thread is in depth:

I like to recommend that all of us do the next and e-mail the Symantec CEO, as clearly nobody on the backside will hear.

E-mail: [email protected]

Topic: Norton Safety –  Symantec as a company is Boastful, Disrespectful and Impolite to its prospects


Lately, Norton Safety has modified its product to deal with the shortage of Norton “Browser Extensions” as a menace with a RED X.     Whilst you present an “Ignore Threat” possibility it not works as anticipated and the RED X stays.   A short while in the past, the “Ignore Threat” possibility would work, after which hours or days later the RED X would return.   Years in the past, the “Ignore threat” can be completely accepted and I’d by no means be aggravated once more.   

Let me clarify one thing to you.   Your group is demonstrating conceitedness, disrespect, and rudeness in how this “threat” is introduced to prospects (newcomers to superior).     Those that select to “Ignore” which is OUR RIGHT, now have precise vital dangers hidden from us.  Aka you might be creating the impact of WHITE noise, and nobody will truly discover once they have a REAL RISK.   Clearly from the highest down in your group, nobody has a clue.  You might be inflicting extra hurt than good.   You might be endangering your prospects with this “SPAM” conduct of requiring us to put in your pathetic excuse for browser extensions.    They sluggish the browser down, they block what should not be blocked they usually simply plain do not work.   But, in an effort to be in a state the place I’m appropriately warned to REAL RISKS, I must set up your extension CRAP.

Significantly, develop up.    FIX THE PROBLEM!   Honor the IGNORE RISK.  

How would you prefer it if this e-mail went to the complete Govt Staff, your board of administrators, my congressmen, the legal professional common?  And it got here from 100s if not 1000s of your prospects.